1/20/11
Seanne Danielak
Student ID Number: 0000499631
Wikiality Essay
EDU 590, Professor: Mr. Bruce Umpstead
Response To Wikiality
Recently, I asked my sixth grade students to involve themselves in a research project that I had never assigned before. The assigment was for them to choose an unfamiliar country and list five important facts about the country's music that would help the class gain a better understanding of how different cultures value music in various parts of the world. These students also had to find pictures of performers from that region and document popular songs by copying links into their word documents. The other students would then be exposed to the information through the peer sharing process. When I received the research back from my students early this week, I was delighted by the results. Unfortunately, my view on this project was instantly tainted due to my own personal experience researching Wikipedia.
Last night I read through these assignments again, finding that Wikipedia was cited in just about every document that was submitted. The problem is that I can no longer credit my students for utilizing a proper, reliable source. If I was able to simply log-in to Wikipedia and completely distort the information about a film score that I know nothing about, then I certainly cannot assume that any of the existing information is credible. I would have attempted to side with Wikipedia if I had received confirmation that, indeed, my changes had not been accepted and my entry was invalid. However, it still has not been corrected after two days, and I'm sure that there have probably been a slew of people that have researched the “Far From Heaven” soundtrack during the last forty eight hours. Ok, it probably hasn’t been perused through at all since the modification, but if I had changed the article on a recent news topic, I’m sure someone’s life would have been affected. Furthermore, how can I trust that the people who are accepting these facts are even legitimate?
Of course, my sixth graders will not be thrilled that I am now going to assign them the task of citing a second source to backup their current information, but the lesson has now evolved into very much more than how it began. In the article “$200 Textbook vs. Free. You Do The Math”, Scott G. McNealy discusses the overwhelming prices of hardcover textbooks and the increased need for online materials. I made a correlation between the Wikipedia assignment and this article after much reflection. I realized that even though we may be saving financially by researching online, are we saving ourselves academically? I would need strong evidence that the facts written into these web books are indeed truthful and convincing me after this experience is going to be an awfully difficult task.
In conclusion, digital online books may potentially hold the risk of including incorrect information. Likewise, even though Wikipedia contains a wealth of information, there is a probability that the contents may be inaccurate and should not be used as a sole source for research.
Bibliography